The National Association of Forensic Criminologists, Archeologists, Skeptics and Historians ™

 

The National Association of Forensic Historians TM

 

Using skeptical inquiry and forensics to expose historical and archaeological fraud

 

* * * * *

BELZEC, CHELMNO, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA

 

Are Two Million People Really Buried In 75 Graves?

 

What kind of  “truth” fears skeptical inquiry and scientific investigation?

* * * * *

Orthodox historiography alleges that - 75 “huge mass graves” - currently exist at the small, precisely known locations of - Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka.

However, to date, not one grave that contains so-much-as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies has ever been located / proven to exist at any of the 4 sites.

If you deny this fact, then it begs the simple question: Where is the alleged proof and what are the names of the so-called experts who have explicitly endorsed it?

* * * * *

  

WHAT  KIND  OF  TRUTH  REQUIRES  LIES  TO  DEFEND  IT?

 

 

Lest you think there must be some truth to the “2 million bodies in 75 graves” canard

 

(Thats the psychology of the big-lie technique at work)

 

The National Association of Forensic Historians TM presents

THE  N.A.F.H.  CRIME  SCENE  INVESTIGATION  CHALLENGE TM

$75,000.00
REWARD

For proving  -  just  1 / 1,000  of  1 %  -  of the fraudulently alleged buried remains claims

  

WHAT  KIND  OF  TRUTH  REQUIRES  LAWS  TO  PROTECT  IT?

 

THE  75  FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED  GRAVES

 The site of the       alleged graves

The number of fraudulently alleged graves

The number of jews claimed to be buried at each site

The method allegedly used by the Germans to conceal their crime

Belzec

33

600,000 *

Dig the bodies out of the alleged graves; then burn them on pyres made from railroad rails; then throw all the teeth and bones back into the same alleged graves; then cover all the physical evidence with a layer of sand.

Chelmno

15

152,000 *

Sobibor

16

250,000 *

Treblinka

11

900,000 *

* * * * *

Total  -  75

  Total  -  1,902,000   -   * Source - Michael Shermer

 

 

Do you really believe that the remains of 1.9 million people could be concealed with a layer of sand?

 

The site of the      alleged graves

The weight of the alleged remains that would have been left behind - IF - the story is true

The number of teeth that would be mixed in with the alleged millions of pounds of bone fragments

Belzec

4.380 million pounds *

19.200 million

Chelmno

1.110 million pounds *

4.864 million

Sobibor

1.825 million pounds *

8.000 million

Treblinka

6.570 million pounds *

28.800 million

* Calculations are derived from figures used by Arnulf Neumaier in his treatise on - TREBLINKA

NOTE: You do understand that even modern cremation ovens do not literally reduce bodies to “ashes” - but rather to BONES AND TEETH - right? Disingenuously referring to the alleged cremated remains as “ashes” is a crucial component of this fraudulent COGNITIVE ILLUSION.

And even though the official story is - the Germans concealed the “refilled graves” with a layer of sand - the sham “skeptic” MICHAEL SHERMER wants you to believe that they have actually been scientifically proven to exist. To illustrate the machinations that Shermer has gone through in support of this charade, look at these quotes from his deluding book - Denying History: “The purpose of this book is to… show precisely, with solid evidence… how historians know that it happened as it did… we must obey the rules of reason and apply the tools of science… This process is practiced by all scientists… historical scientists, geologists, paleontologists and archaeologists, to prove that anything in the past happened… We must review the physical evidence.

Shermer added to the guise with these addtional duplicitous claims in - Denying History: “To debunk the deniers cant we just go there and see for ourselves? The answer, of course, is “yes.” We can no longer ignore the deniers… We cannot remain silent anymore. It’s time to respond… We went to Europe to conduct research at Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec… We wanted to see for ourselves just what evidence there is at the camps and to take the opportunity to examine firsthand the claims… How is it that so much physical evidence can come to be doubted?

WHAT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE? - There have been no less than 4 major so-called “crime scene” investigations of Treblinka, and a number of major investigations of the other 3 camps as well - and who knows how many minor investigations at all 4 camps over the years; yet to date, it can still be categorically stated that archaeologists / forensic investigators have never located / proven the existence of even one extant mass grave at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor or Treblinka that contains so-much-as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies - NOT ONE!

Now look at the other side of Shermer’s transparant attempt at deception, exemplified by these DELIBERATE OMISSIONS from - Denying History, the most blatant being this HERE: It seems inconceivable that you were unaware of the investigations at Treblinka Or did you suppress them? For a more thorough treatise on these earlier exculpatory investigations, click HERE: In August of 1944 the Soviets carried out a thorough forensic investigation at Treblinka. And what did their numerous excavations uncover? Refuse pits: filled with burned and unburned trash. No mass graves were found Yet another forensic examination was carried out by the Poles in November of 1945 which included more excavations… ‘The excavations began where, according to the witness, a mass grave was supposed to exist… There were no human remains found After his investigation, Lukaszkiewicz issued a protocol which was presented by the Soviets at the Nuremberg trial as Document USSR-344. In said official protocol, Lukaszkiewicz admitted the truth about his investigation with this telling confession: During the work on the terrain, I found no mass graves.’”

So now you know why Shermer deliberately omitted the inconvenient fact that there have been numerous on-site forensic investigations conducted at these 4 camps - which failed to locate the physical evidence required to support the absurd “extermination camp” thesis. And that is why, with the help of shameless propagandists like Shermer, previous exculpatory investigations of the camps are being put down the memory hole. You also now know that Shermer’s deceitful insinuations have been thoroughly DEBUNKED: That is the only way to understand this subject. It has to be studied carefully… If you slow down and look carefully at the logic, his illusion doesn't work Shermer has set up his argument in such a way that the ordinary methods of logic don't apply. This is like a shell game: you have to watch what he's doing… The Shermer principle is not logic… The jumping together phenomenon is how illusionists produce their illusions.”

  

NO  MASS  GRAVES  =  COGNITIVE  ILLUSION

 

 

The rules for laying claim to

THE  N.A.F.H.  CRIME  SCENE  INVESTIGATION  CHALLENGE TM  REWARDS

 

$1,000.00 will be awarded for each one of the 75 alleged “graves” that are proven - with the utmost certainty - to contain the remains of - at least 19 bodies.

 

To begin the incredibly easy, four-part process of laying claim to each reward:

 

 

First - Potential claimants must contact The N.A.F.H. and submit their answer to - The $75,000.00 Question (see below).

 

Second - Potential claimants must then request and confirm receipt of the official posting rules.

 

Third - Potential claimants must then post their alleged “proof” on an approved website.

 

Fourth - If a potential claimant can get Michael Shermer to categorically endorse their eligibly submitted “proof” (by explicitly stating that said posted “proof” meets his own, “Skeptic” Magazine’s and The “Skeptics” Society’s expressed and implied standards of proof), the claimant will receive a $1,000.00 reward.

 

 

NOTE: If Shermer refuses to endorse an eligible “proof,” potential claimants can still receive a secondary reward by getting a judge to rule that their submittal did not contain any errors of stated fact and did in fact meet the proven - with the utmost certainty - qualification and did in fact meet Michael Shermer’s, “Skeptic” Magazine’s and The “Skeptics” Society’s expressed and implied standards of proof. (If that fails, true-believer Roberto Muehlenkamp becomes the endorser of last resort.) Eligible potential claimants must contact The N.A.F.H. and request and confirm receipt of the details.

 

Also note that, for those who deny the obvious fact that the fraudulently alleged mass grave claims are vacuous cognitive illusions, yet lack the courage, integrity and character to accept - The C.S.I. Challenge; The N.A.F.H. offers numerous secondary challenges / cash rewards as well, most notably - for simply answering The $75,000.00 Question, for simply accepting any N.A.F.H. sponsored challenge / answering any N.A.F.H. question(s) for which there is a reward offered - i.e. - cash rewards are offered for simply answering questions - even without endorsement. (Restrictions apply. As with all reward offers, requesting the details from The N.A.F.H. is the first step towards eligibility.), and - for simply identifying / proving any untrue statement of fact found on this webpage.

 

FYI - The N.A.F.H. challenges any doubtful eligible potential claimant to a specific reward offer to accept a wager on its ability to make good on the promised payment. To date, no one - including the spineless prevaricators who deceivingly allege that - The C.S.I. Challenge is not financially backed by an association of supporters, has dared to accept the wager. (Go figure.)

 

Remember, all that is being done here is simply asking to see the alleged “proof” that the weak-minded true-believers insist is so “undeniable.” If the so-called “proof” really does exist - as is sophistically asserted, then the cash rewards offered by The N.A.F.H. would be claimed in a heartbeat. And that is a fact that only a self-deceiving coward would refuse to admit.

 

  

NO  MASS  GRAVES  =  HISTORICAL  FRAUD

 

 

New Challenge / Reward Offer

 

The National Association of Forensic Historians TM

 

will remit a - $5,000.00 reward - to the first person who uncovers the elusive answers to these

 

5 Simple Questions About 4 Suspicious WW II Era Mass Grave Sites

 

(Legitimate scientists do not fear answering pertinent questions about their claimed discoveries.)

 

# 1 - At Belzec - it is known, with the utmost certainty that, as of - 1/27/14 - no more than and no less than __?__ extant graves have been found in which legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators have - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented forensic science, literally - physically unearthed / tangibly located - scientifically verified human remains.

 

# 2 - At Chelmno - it is known, with the utmost certainty that, as of - 1/27/14 - no more than and no less than __?__ extant graves have been found in which legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators have - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented forensic science, literally - physically unearthed / tangibly located - scientifically verified human remains.

 

# 3 - At Sobibor - it is known, with the utmost certainty that, as of - 1/27/14 - no more than and no less than __?__ extant graves have been found in which legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators have - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented forensic science, literally - physically unearthed / tangibly located - scientifically verified human remains.

 

# 4 - At Treblinka - it is known, with the utmost certainty that, as of - 1/27/14 - no more than and no less than __?__ extant graves have been found in which legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators have - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented forensic science, literally - physically unearthed / tangibly located - scientifically verified human remains.

 

# 5 - As of - 1/27/14 - the one extant grave located / proven to exist - in which the most actual / scientifically verified human remains have literally / truly been physically unearthed / tangibly located by legitimate archaeologists / crime scene investigators at - Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II - via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology / forensic science, has been proven with the utmost certainty to be - __?__ grave # __?__.

 

(Potential claimants must contact The N.A.F.H. and request and confirm receipt of the details.)

 

  

NO  MASS  GRAVES  =  CRIMINAL  FRAUD

 

 

The N.A.F.H. “Mass Graves / Buried Remains” Forensic Evaluation Form

 

Do you believe what orthodox historians / archaeologists allege about Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka? If so, then - for each one of the 75 alleged “graves” - correctly answer the following simple questions honestly, unequivocally and - in complete accordance - with the directions.

 

Note # 1: The definition of “grave” is: Any alleged place of burial - i.e. - any alleged pit or trench in the ground or any alleged tomb / mausoleum / structure built above ground that has been alleged to contain human remains.

 

Note # 2: A brief description of each alleged grave can be found below.

 

Note # 3: Provide - ONLY - the correct information that each question asks for and how it is asked for - nothing more - nothing less. Any attempt at obfuscation will automatically disqualify a potential reward claimant for consideration of a reward.

 

 

Part One:

 

1 - Has anyone ever claimed or implied that this alleged “grave” currently contains human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

2 - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - physically unearthed / tangibly located - human remains in this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

3 - The number of people - whose names you can provide - who claim to have actually - physically unearthed / tangibly located - human remains in this alleged “grave,” is no less than __?__.

 

4 - The name of the person who claims to have actually - physically unearthed / tangibly located - the most human remains in this alleged “grave” is - __?__.

 

Note: If you answered - No. - to question 2 - AND - 0 / zero - to question 3 for this alleged “grave,” then respond to this question with - NA.

 

5 - Can you list the - EXACT kind - and - PRECISE number / amount - of human remains claimed by the person whose name you provided for an answer to question 4, to have actually been - physically unearthed / tangibly located - in this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

Note: If your response to question 4 for this alleged “grave” was - NA. - then respond to this question with - NA.

 

6 - If your answer to question 5 is - Yes. - then provide the - ACTUAL NUMBER / WEIGHT - of claimed - physically unearthed / tangibly located - human remains in this alleged “grave” by giving the correct single numeric figure - nothing more - nothing less.

 

6A - Whole human corpses (number) - __?__.

 

6B - Partial human corpses (number) - __?__.

 

6C - Complete human skeletons (number) - __?__.

 

6D - Human skulls (number) - __?__.

 

6E - Complete individual human bones (number)  - __?__.

 

6F - Human bone fragments (number) - __?__.

 

6G - Human bone fragments (weight) - __?__.

 

6H - Complete human teeth (number) - __?__.

 

6I - Partial human teeth (number) - __?__.

 

6J - Human remains (weight) - __?__.

 

 

Part Two:

 

A - Is it known - with the utmost certainty - that this alleged “grave” actually / currently exists - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

B - The average thickness (in meters / centimeters) of the layer of soil that allegedly seperates ground level and the top of the alleged human remains in this alleged “grave” is - __?__.

 

C - Is it known - with the utmost certainty - what the precise volume (in cubic meters to + / - one cubic meter) of this alleged “grave” is - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

D - If your answer to question C is - Yes. - then: The precise volume (in cubic meters to + / - one cubic meter) of this alleged “grave” is known - with the utmost certainty - to be - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__ cubic meters.

 

E - Has anyone ever claimed to have conducted a geophysical investigation of the camp where this alleged “grave” supposedly exists - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

F - Has the existence of this alleged “grave” ever been proven - with the utmost certainty - via one or more of the following geophysical methods: Ground Penetrating Radar, Magnetrometry, Resistivity and Conductivity, EM61 High Resolution Metal Detection, GEM19 Overhauser GPS Magnetic Gradiometer or EM38 Terrain Conductivity Meter - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

G - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - physically unearthed / tangibly located - so-much-as ONE fired bullet from within this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

H - If your answer to question G is - Yes. - then: The number of fired bullets that is known - with the utmost certainty - to currently exist within this alleged “grave” is - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__.

 

I - Can you provide a photograph of a fired bullet that was uncovered or extracted from the inside of this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

J - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - physically unearthed / tangibly located - so-much-as ONE human tooth from within this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

K - If your answer to question J is - Yes. - then: The number of human teeth that is known - with the utmost certainty - to currently exist within this alleged “grave” is - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__.

 

L - Can you provide a photograph of a human tooth that was uncovered or extracted from the inside of this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

M - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - physically unearthed / tangibly located - so-much-as ONE human bone fragment from within this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

N - If your answer to question M is - Yes. - then: The number of human bone fragments that is known - with the utmost certainty - to currently exist within this alleged “grave” is - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__.

 

O - Can you provide a photograph of a human bone fragment that was uncovered or extracted from the inside of this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

P - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - physically unearthed / tangibly located - so-much-as ONE “whole” human corpse from within this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

Q - If your answer to question P is - Yes. - then: The number of “whole” human corpses that is known - with the utmost certainty - to currently exist within this alleged “grave” is - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__.

 

R - Can you provide a photograph of a “whole” human corpse, or even part of a human corpse, that was uncovered or extracted from the inside of this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

S - The number of people - whose names you can provide - who claim to have literally seen - with their own eyes - human bones and/or human teeth and/or human corpses and/or parts of human corpses - within and/or extracted from - this alleged “grave,” is no less than __?__.

 

T - Is it known - with the utmost certainty - via laboratory DNA / “micro-chemical” analysis that - ANYTHING - claimed to have been extracted from within this alleged “grave” is of human origin - Yes. - or - No. ??

 

U - The number of people - whose names you can provide - who claim to have literally participated in the laboratory DNA / “micro-chemical” analysis that proved - with the utmost certainty - that - ANYTHING - claimed to have been extracted from within this alleged “grave” is of human origin, is no less than __?__.

 

V - Can you provide an actual / tangible photocopy of a legitimate scientific paper which details any alleged laboratory DNA / “micro-chemical” analysis that forensically proved - with the utmost certainty - that - ANYTHING - claimed to have been extracted from within this alleged “grave” is of human origin - Yes. - or - No. ??

 

(Note: If your answer to question X is - Yes. - your answer will not be accepted until you mail said actual / tangible photocopy of said legitimate scientific paper to The N.A.F.H. for verification.)

 

W - The number of people - whose names you can provide - who claim to have literally seen - with their own eyes - a legitimate scientific paper which details any alleged laboratory DNA / “micro-chemical” analysis that forensically proved - with the utmost certainty - that - ANYTHING - claimed to have been extracted from within this alleged “grave” is of human origin, is no less than __?__.

 

 

Note: The first person on the following two lists who completes the above questionnaire in complete accordance with the directions, will receive a - $100.00 reward - for each “grave” completed and will also earn the opportunity to defend their answers in a public debate against Greg Gerdes (see below) - provided they have the courage, integrity and character to do so.


List A: Mikkel Andersson, Philip Blood, Christopher Browning, Mike Curtis, Martin Davidson, Martin Dean, Andrzej Gawryszewski, Michael Gelb, Richard Green, Patrick Groff, Jonathan Harrison, Albrecht Kolthoff, Jurgen Langowski, Peter Laponder, Ralf Loserth, Andrew Mathis, Jamie McCarthy, Gord McFee, Christian Mentel, Roberto Muehlenkamp, Jason Myer, Michael Peters, Antony Polonsky, David Rich, Sergey Romanov, Sara Salzman, Andrea Simon, Nick Terry, Steve Tyas, Leonid Tyorushkin, David Woolfe, John Zimmerman.


List B: Diane Ackerman, Alex Bay, Peter Black, Sara Bloomfield, David Cesarani, Caroline Sturdy Colls, Thomas Dalton, Jim Dominic, Deborah Dwork, Richard Freund, Abraham Foxman, David Gluck, Juliet Golden, David Green, Alex Grobman, Yoram Haimi, Bonnie Harris, Alan Hart, Alan Heath, Michelle Hilling, David Irving, Penn Jillete, Ephraim Kaye, Andrzej Kola, Thomas Kues, Deborah Lipstadt, Carmelo Lisciotto, Daniel Loxton, Wojciech Mazurek, Gary North, Lucja Nowak, Robin O’Neil, Avi Patt, James Randi, Karolina Ratajczak, Rafal Ratajczak, Philip Reeder, William Rutherford, Sarah Rutmanm, Michael Shermer, Steve Shives, Claudia Theune, Michael Tregenza, Chris Webb, Mark Weber, and any employee of - ARCHAEOLOGY magazine.

 

FYI - Greg Gerdes, President of The N.A.F.H., has agreed to publicly debate any willing recipient of the just mentioned reward. (Note: Deanna Spingola has agreed to host the debate on her radio program.) However, not one person listed above has ever dared to even attempt earning the reward by completing - The N.A.F.H. “Mass Graves / Buried Remains” Forensic Evaluation Form - out of fear that a public debate with Mr. Gerdes would undoubtedly expose them as liars and frauds. (Potential claimants must contact The N.A.F.H. and request and confirm receipt of the details.)

 

  

It is an irrefutable fact that not one person who espouses the orthodox stories of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka has ever had the courage, integrity and character to accept the - Crime Scene Investigation Challenge TM - NOT ONE!

 

 

The thing that has to be done now, so that everyone is on the same page, is to identify each one of the

75 so-called “huge mass graves that are claimed to exist at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka:



Belzec - The 33 “huge mass graves” (#1/1 though #33/33 of the alleged 75) are shown and numbered in the maps on pages 117 & 118 in this link here:

http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=9

 

NOTE: Click on the PDF Download Option.


Chelmno - The 15 “huge mass graves” (#1/34 though #15/48 of the alleged 75) are shown in this map here:

http://www.deathcamps.org/occupation...lmnoforest.jpg

Alleged “grave” #1/34 is the one claimed to be - “irregular in shape; the width of the northern part 8 meters and narrows by 3 meters towards the south. Its length equals 62 meters.” Alleged depth? - “Unknown.”

Alleged “grave” #2/35 is the one claimed to be - “total length equals 254 meters.” Alleged width? - “Unknown.” Alleged depth? - “3 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #3/36 is the one claimed to be - “length 174 meters, width 8 meters.” Alleged depth? - “Unknown.”

Alleged “grave” #4/37 is the one claimed to be - “Its actual width equals 10 meters, while its length is 182 meters.” Alleged depth? - “Unknown.”

Alleged “grave” #5/38 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the most southerly of the 11 alleged “mass graves” in an alleged line of “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #6/39 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 2nd alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #7/40 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 3rd alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #8/41 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 4th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #9/42 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 5th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #10/43 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 6th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #11/44 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 7th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #12/45 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 8th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #13/46 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 9th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #14/47 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 10th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #15/48 is the one claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the most northerly of the 11 alleged “mass graves” in an alleged line of “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

 

Sobibor - The 16 “huge mass graves” (#1/49 though #16/64 of the alleged 75) are shown and numbered in the map on page 3 in this link here:

http://sobibor.info.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Report-by-Y.Haimi-autumn-winter-2012-2013.pdf

“Huge mass grave” #16/64 is the fraudulently alleged “ash mound” / mausoleum / monument.

NOTE: The N.A.F.H. acknowledges that “huge mass graves” - #12/60, #13/61 and #14/62 - have actually been located / proven to exist and contain human remains. (See above link.)

 

 

Treblinka - The 11 “huge mass graves” (#1/65 though #11/75 of the alleged 75) are shown in this map here:

 

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/58004000/gif/_58004030_treblinka_464.gif

 

Alleged “grave” #1/65 is the one claimed to be - the northernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #2/66 is the one claimed to be - the 2nd northernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #3/67 is the one claimed to be - the 3rd northernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #4/68 is the one claimed to be - the 4th northernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #5/69 is the one claimed to be - the southernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #6/70 is the one claimed to be - the single, small rectangular trench in the north central area of the camp.


Alleged “grave” #7/71 is the one claimed to be - the northernmost of the two small pits in the south central area of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #8/72 is the one claimed to be - the southernmost of the two small pits in the south central area of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #9/73 is the one claimed to be - the single, large pit in the area that is claimed to be the former reception area of the camp.

 

Alleged “grave” #10/74 is the one claimed to be - the northernmost of the two large pits in the south eastern area of the camp.

 

Alleged “grave” #11/75 is the one claimed to be - the southernmost of the two large pits in the south eastern area of the camp.

 

 

* * * * *

The $75,000.00 Question:

 

How many of the 75 alleged huge mass graves” claimed to exist at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and

Treblinka ( II ) can you prove - with the utmost certainty - contain the remains of at least 19 bodies?


* * * * *

 

Truth does not fear skeptical inquiry and scientific investigation!

 

All information on this website constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted material as provided

for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Last updated on 4 / 24 / 14. All rights reserved.

 

For more information, contact - The N.A.F.H. at: treblinkafraud@yahoo.com

 

* * * * *

 

 

Why do people continue to espouse forensically refuted lies even after being

 confronted with the incontrovertible facts that refute them? Because you can’t

 convince a true-believer of anything - for their beliefs are not based on science

 and reason - they’re based on blind faith and a weak-willed NEED to believe.

Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool critical thinkers - but rather;

Only to give self-deceiving cowards an excuse not to think at all.

* * * * *

A hallmark of self-deceiving cowards is their acceptance of

 authority as their truth - rather than the truth as their authority.