The National Association of Forensic Criminologists, Archeologists, Skeptics and Historians ™

 

The National Association of Forensic Historians TM

 

Using skeptical inquiry and forensics to prove historical and archaeological fraud

 

* * * * *

BELZEC, CHELMNO, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA

 

Are Two Million People Really Buried In 70 Graves?

 

What kind of  “truth” fears skeptical inquiry and scientific investigation?

* * * * *

Orthodox historians allege that the remains of approximately two million people are buried in 70 “graves” at the 4 very small, precisely known locations of - Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka.

However, it is a historical fact that not one “grave” that contains so-much-as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies has ever been located / proven to exist at any of the 4 sites.

If you deny this fact, then it begs the simple question:  Where is the so-called “proof” and what are the names of the forensic experts who have explicitly endorsed it?

* * * * *

  

WHAT  KIND  OF  “TRUTH”  REQUIRES  LIES  TO  DEFEND  IT?

 

 

Lest you think there must be some truth to the “2 million bodies in 70 graves” canard

 

(That’s the psychology of the big-lie technique at work)

 

The National Association of Forensic Historians TM presents

THE  N.A.F.H.  CRIME  SCENE  INVESTIGATION  CHALLENGE TM

$70,000.00
REWARD

For proving  -  just  1 / 1,000  of  1 %  -  of the fraudulently alleged buried remains claims

  

WHAT  KIND  OF  “TRUTH”  REQUIRES  LAWS  TO  PROTECT  IT?

 

THE  70  FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED  “GRAVES”

 The site of the       alleged “graves”

The number of fraudulently alleged “graves”

The number of jews claimed to be buried at each site

The method allegedly used by the Germans to conceal their “crime”
Belzec

33

600,000 *

Dig the bodies out of the alleged “graves;” then burn them on pyres made from railroad rails; then throw all the teeth and bones back into the same alleged “graves;” then cover all the physical evidence with a layer of soil.

Chelmno

15

152,000 *

Sobibor

11

250,000 *

Treblinka

11

900,000 *

* * * * *

Total  -  70

  Total  -  1,902,000   -   * Source - Michael Shermer

 

 

Do you really believe that the remains of 1.9 million people could be concealed with a layer of soil?

 

The site of the      alleged “graves”

The weight of the alleged remains that would have been left behind - IF - the story is true

The number of teeth that would be mixed in with the alleged millions of pounds of bone fragments
Belzec

4.380 million pounds *

19.200 million

Chelmno

1.110 million pounds *

4.864 million

Sobibor

1.825 million pounds *

8.000 million

Treblinka

6.570 million pounds *

28.800 million

* Calculations are derived from figures used by Arnulf Neumaier in his treatise on - TREBLINKA

 

NOTE: You do understand that even modern cremation ovens do not reduce bodies to “ashes,” but rather to - BONES AND TEETH - right? Disingenuously referring to the alleged cremated remains as “ashes” rather than correctly referring to them as bone fragments and teeth is a crucial component of this malicious, criminally fraudulent - big-lie / cognitive illusion.

And even though the official story-line is - the Germans concealed the alleged “graves” with a layer of soil - the sham “skeptic” MICHAEL SHERMER claims that he has “scientifically proven” that the phantom physical evidence in these fraudulently alleged “graves” actually does exist. To illustrate the sophistic machinations that Shermer and his “Skeptics” Society minions have gone through to make this blatantly fraudulent claim, look at these quotes from Shermer’s shamelessly deluding book - Denying History: “The purpose of this book is to… show precisely, with solid evidence… how historians know that it happened as it did… we must obey the rules of reason and apply the tools of science… This process is practiced by all scientists… historical scientists, geologists, paleontologists and archaeologists, to prove that anything in the past happened… We must review the physical evidence.”

WHAT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE? There have been no less than 4 major “crime scene” investigations of Treblinka - and numerous major C.S.I. investigations at the other 3 camps as well - and who knows how many minor investigations at all 4 camps over the years, and yet, to date, it can still be categorically stated that:

It is a forensically proven fact that not so-much-as one actual grave has ever been located / proven to exist at

Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor or Treblinka that contains so-much-as - 1 / 1,000 of 1 % - of the alleged buried bodies.

So why do the defenders of this sophistic - big-lie / cognitive illusion - keep telling lame, easily refutable lies rather than simply providing legitimate proof of their claims? How hard would it be to actually prove the existence and contents of these fraudulently alleged “graves” using modern forensic science techniques?

Especially when you consider the following claim found in Yitzhak Arad’s deluding book - BELZEC, SOBIBOR, TREBLINKA - (chapter 23) - The Erasure of the Crimes: “Ultimately it was decided to dump the ash and bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to cover them with a thick layer of sand… [Eyewitness] Abraham Goldfarb relates: …’we secretly placed in the walls of the graves whole skeletons and we wrote on scraps of paper what the Germans were doing. We put the scraps of paper into bottles, which we placed next to the skeletons. Our intention was that if one day someone looked for traces, they could indeed be found.’”

Yes, “traces” could easily be found - IF - the absurd burial claims are actually true. Yet Shermer accuses real skeptics of “denying history” because they refuse to accept his nonsensical convergence of evidence “theory” rather than tangible physical evidence. In his sophistic and sophomoric attempt to “prove” his spurious accusations, he has not only turned the scientific method on its head, but the fundamental principles of skepticism as well. Look again at his own words from Denying History: “To debunk the deniers can’t we just go there and see for ourselves? The answer, of course, is “yes.” We can no longer ignore the deniers… We cannot remain silent anymore. It’s time to respond… We went to Europe to conduct research at… Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec… We wanted to see for ourselves just what evidence there is at the camps and to take the opportunity to examine firsthand the claims… How is it that so much physical evidence can come to be doubted?”

Again - What physical evidence? For further evidence of Shermer’s fraud, notice these DELIBERATE OMISSIONS from - Denying History, the most blatant being this HERE: “It seems inconceivable that you were unaware of the investigations at Treblinka… Or did you suppress them?” For a more thorough treatise on these earlier exculpatory investigations, click HERE: “In August of 1944 the Soviets carried out a thorough forensic investigation at Treblinka. And what did their numerous excavations uncover? Refuse pits - filled with burned and unburned trash. No mass graves were found… Another forensic examination was carried out by the Poles in November of 1945 which included more excavations… ‘The excavations began where, according to the witness, a mass grave was supposed to exist… There were no human remains found… After his investigation, Lukaszkiewicz issued a protocol which was presented by the Soviets at the Nuremberg show trial as Document USSR-344. In said official protocol, Lukaszkiewicz admitted the truth about his investigation with this telling confession: ‘During the work on the terrain, I found no mass graves.’”

So now you know why Shermer omitted the inconvenient fact that there have been numerous on-site forensic investigations conducted at Treblinka which never located an actual mass grave, or that the fraudulently alleged “mass graves” that were excavated were proven to be nothing more than - trash pits. And that is why, with the help of shameless liars like Shermer, all previous exculpatory forensic investigations of the camps are being put down the memory hole. Do you see how easy it is to see through the - big-lie / cognitive illusion - when you open your eyes and think for yourself?

RECAP: Covering millions of pounds of bone fragments and teeth with a layer of soil can conceal all evidence of a crime? Debunked. Shermer’s fraudulent claim that the remains of over 1.9 million bodies have been scientifically proven to exist? DEBUNKED: “That's the only way to understand this subject. It has to be studied carefully… If you slow down and look carefully at the logic, his illusion doesn't work… Shermer has set up his argument in such a way that the ordinary methods of logic don't apply… This is like a shell game: you have to watch what he's doing… The Shermer principle is not logic… The jumping together phenomenon is how illusionists produce their illusions.”

 

  

NO  BURIED  REMAINS  =  COGNITIVE  ILLUSION

 

 

The rules for laying claim to

THE  N.A.F.H.  CRIME  SCENE  INVESTIGATION  CHALLENGE TM  REWARDS

 

$1,000.00 will be awarded for each one of the 70 fraudulently alleged “graves” that are proven - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - to exist and to contain the remains of - at least 19 bodies.

 

To begin the incredibly easy, four-part process of laying claim to each reward:

 

 

First - Potential claimants must contact The N.A.F.H. (contact information is at the bottom of this page) and submit a single numeric figure as their answer to The $70,000.00 Question (see below).

 

Second - After submitting their unequivocal answer to The $70,000.00 question, potential claimants must then again contact The N.A.F.H. and request and confirm receipt of the official posting rules.

 

Third - After completing all prerequisites, potential claimants must then post their alleged “proof” that the alleged “grave” contains the remains of at least 19 bodies on - SHERMER'S OWN FORUM.

 

Fourth - If a potential claimant can get Michael Shermer to categorically endorse an eligible posted “proof” (by explicitly stating that said posted “proof” meets his own, “Skeptic” Magazine’s and The “Skeptics” Society’s expressed and implied standards of proof), the claimant will receive a $1,000.00 reward.

 

 

NOTE: If Shermer refuses to endorse an eligible “proof,” potential claimants can still receive a secondary reward by getting a judge to rule that their submittal did not contain any errors of stated fact and did in fact meet the proven - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - qualification and did in fact meet Michael Shermer’s, “Skeptic” Magazine’s and The “Skeptics” Society’s expressed and implied standards of proof. (Potential claimants must contact The N.A.F.H. directly for details.)

 

Also note that, for those deceitful charlatans who deny the fact that the fraudulently alleged “mass grave / buried remains” claims are vacuous cognitive illusions, yet lack the courage, integrity and character to accept - The C.S.I. Challenge; The N.A.F.H. also offers cash rewards to: anyone who can simply identify the one alleged “grave” in which the most human remains have been actually - physically discovered / tangibly located, and; for simply identifying the single most explicitly endorsed “mass grave / buried remains proof” ever proffered for each of the four camps, and; for simply submitting relevant articles to - Archaeology Magazine. (They don’t even have to get published!) There are other secondary challenges / rewards as well, most notably - the cash reward offered for simply indentifying / proving any untrue statement of fact found on this webpage.

 

FYI - The National Association of Forensic Historians TM offers over - $100,000.00 - in total reward money for its various “holocaust” related archaeological / forensic challenges - and doubtful potential claimants to any reward amount are also challenged to accept a wager on its ability to make good on any promised payment. To date, no one - including the prevaricators who deceivingly allege that The N.A.F.H. has no “members” supporting its challenges, has dared to accept the wager. (Go figure.)

 

Remember, all that is being done here, is simply asking to see the actual so-called “proof” that the weak-minded true believers insist is so “undeniable.” (It takes a special kind of self-deceiving coward to interpret such a rational act as - “anti-Semitism,” or maliciously demonize logical, critically thinking people who make such reasonable requests as - “haters” and/or “deniers.”) Also, if the fraudulently alleged asked for “undeniable proof” really does exist - as is sophistically asserted, then the one hundred thousand + dollars in reward money offered by The N.A.F.H. would be claimed in a heartbeat. And that is a fact that only a charlatan or self-deceiving coward would refuse to admit.

 

  

It is a historical fact that not one of the fraudulently alleged “graves” of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka has ever been proven to contain so-much-as 1/1,000  of  1% of the alleged buried bodies. It is also an irrefutable fact that no “mass grave / buried remains proof” has ever been explicitly endorsed by Michael Shermer (or any other member of The “Skeptics” Society) as meeting his own, Skeptic Magazine’s and The Skeptics Society’s claimed standards of proof.

NO  EXPLICIT  ENDORSEMENT  =  NO  LEGITIMATE  PROOF

 

 

The N.A.F.H. “Mass Graves / Buried Remains” Forensic Evaluation Form

 

Do you believe the spurious claims made by orthodox historians that there are approximately two million people buried in 70 alleged “graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka? Have you fallen for the fraudulent cognitive illusion that these 70 alleged “graves” have been located / proven to exist and contain human remains? If so, then please provide the so-called “proof” that you use to base your beliefs on by correctly answering the following very simple questions:

 

For each one of the 70 alleged “graves” - correctly answer the following simple questions honestly, unequivocally and - IN COMPLETE ACCORDANCE - with the directions.

 

Note # 1: The definition of “grave” is: Any alleged place of burial - i.e. - any alleged pit or trench in the ground or any alleged tomb / mausoleum / structure built above ground that allegedly contains human remains.

 

Note # 2: A brief description of each alleged “grave” can be found below.

 

Note # 3: Provide - ONLY - the correct information that each question asks for and - HOW - it is asked for - NOTHING more - NOTHING less. Responding to any question with a lie or any attempt at obfuscation will automatically disqualify an eligible potential claimant for consideration of a $500.00 reward (see below).

 

 

Part One:

 

1 - Has anyone ever claimed or implied that this alleged “grave” actually exists / contains human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

2 - Can you prove - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that this alleged pit was NOT in fact dug before the Germans began administering the camp where this alleged “grave” supposedly exists - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

Note: For alleged Sobibor “grave” #8/56, respond to this question with - NA.

 

3 - Can you prove - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that this alleged pit was NOT in fact a trash and/or trash burning pit or a pit used to bury or burn some other kind of waste / refuse (other than human corpses / remains) or a latrine pit or a water well - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

Note: For alleged Sobibor “grave” #8/56, respond to this question with - NA.

 

4 - Can you prove - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that this alleged pit was NOT in fact dug by investigators or so-called “robbery diggers / treasure seekers” after the Germans shut down the camp - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

Note: For alleged Sobibor “grave” #8/56, respond to this question with - NA.

 

5 - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - human remains in this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

6 - The number of people - WHOSE NAMES YOU CAN PROVIDE - who claim to have actually - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - human remains in this alleged “grave,” is no less than __?__.

 

7 - The name of the person who claims to have actually - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - the most human remains in this alleged “grave” is - __?__.

 

Note: If you answered - No. - to question 5 - AND - 0 / zero - to question 6 for this alleged “grave,” then respond to this question with - NA.

 

8 - Can you list the - EXACT kind - and - PRECISE number / amount - of human remains claimed by the person whose name you provided for an answer to question 7, to have been actually - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - in this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

Note: If your response to question 7 for this alleged “grave” was - NA. - then respond to this question with - NA.

 

9 - If your answer to question 8 is - Yes. - then provide the - ACTUAL NUMBER / AMOUNT - of claimed - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - human remains in this alleged “grave” by giving the correct single numeric figure - NOTHING more - NOTHING less.

 

9A - Whole human corpses (number) - __?__.

 

9B - Partial human corpses (number) - __?__.

 

9C - Complete human skeletons (number) - __?__.

 

9D - Partial human skeletons (number) - __?__.

 

9E - Complete human skulls (number) - __?__.

 

9F - Partial human skulls (number) - __?__.

 

9G - Complete individual human bones (number)  - __?__.

 

9H - Human bone fragments (number) - __?__.

 

9I - Human bone fragments (amount in ounces / pounds) - __?__.

 

9J - Complete human teeth (number) - __?__.

 

9K - Partial human teeth (number) - __?__.

 

9L - Complete and partial human teeth combined (amount in ounces / pounds) - __?__.

 

10 - The alleged thickness (in inches / feet) of the layer of soil that allegedly covers this alleged “grave,” that allegedly separates the top of the alleged remains and ground level, ranges from - __?__ - to - __?__.

 

 

Part Two:

 

Note # 1: The ONLY questions where the response - NA - (Not Applicable) will be considered a legitimate answer in part two is for questions D (if you answered - NO. - to question C), H (if you answered - NO. - to question G), K (if you answered - NO. - to question J), N (if you answered - NO. - to question M) Q (if you answered - NO. - to question P) and question T (if you answered - NO. - to question S).

 

Note # 2: Any response to questions D, H, K, N, Q, U, W, Y and Z that is anything more than a single numeric figure (examples of legitimate numeric answers: .00001, 1, 4.6, 17, 239, 1,426, etc.) will be deemed unequivocal and an attempt at obfuscation and thus - not in accordance with the directions.

 

 

A - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that this alleged “grave” actually / currently exists - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

B - Do you deny the fact that there are many intelligent, rational and honest critical thinkers all over the world who, after many years of diligent research, have come to the conclusion that the claims made about the existence of this alleged “grave,” and/or its alleged contents, are nothing more than a fraudulent cognitive illusion - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

C - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - what the precise volume (in cubic meters to + / - one cubic meter) of this alleged “grave” is - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

D - If your answer to question C is - Yes. - then: The precise volume (in cubic meters to + / - one cubic meter) of this alleged “grave” is known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - to be - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__ cubic meters.

 

E - Has anyone ever claimed to have conducted a geophysical investigation of the camp where this alleged “grave” supposedly exists - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

F - Has the existence of this alleged “grave” ever been proven - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via one or more of the following geophysical methods: Ground Penetrating Radar, Magnetrometry, Resistivity and Conductivity, EM61 High Resolution Metal Detection, GEM19 Overhauser GPS Magnetic Gradiometer or EM38 Terrain Conductivity Meter - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

G - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - so-much-as ONE bullet from within this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

H - If your answer to question G is - Yes. - then: The number of bullets that is known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - to currently exist within this alleged “grave” is - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__.

 

I - Can you provide a photograph of a bullet that was extracted from the inside of this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

J - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - so-much-as ONE tooth from within this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

K - If your answer to question J is - Yes. - then: The number of teeth that is known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - to currently exist within this alleged “grave” is - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__.

 

L - Can you provide a photograph of a tooth that was extracted from the inside of this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

M - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - so-much-as ONE bone fragment from within this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

N - If your answer to question M is - Yes. - then: The weight of bone fragments that is known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - to currently exist within this alleged “grave” is - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__ pounds.

 

O - Can you provide a photograph of a bone fragment that was extracted from the inside of this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

P - Has anyone ever claimed to have actually - PHYSICALLY DISCOVERED / TANGIBLY LOCATED - so-much-as ONE “whole” corpse from within this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

Q - If your answer to question P is - Yes. - then: The number of “whole” corpses that is known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - to currently exist within this alleged “grave” is - NO MORE THAN AND NO LESS THAN - __?__.

 

R - Can you provide a photograph of a “whole” corpse, or even part of a corpse, that was extracted from the inside of this alleged “grave” - Yes. - or - No. - ??

 

S - Can you prove - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that this alleged “grave” currently contains the remains of at least 19 bodies - Yes. - or - No. ??

 

T - Do you have the courage, integrity and character to prove that you have officially accepted - The National Association of Forensic Historians TM - Crime Scene Investigation Challenge TM - by posting your alleged “proven with 100 % certainty” - “mass graves / buried remains proof” for this alleged “grave” on the so-called “Skeptics” Society’s forum while complying with the official N.A.F.H. - C.S.I. posting rules to the letter - Yes. - or - No. ??

 

U - The number of people - WHOSE NAMES YOU CAN PROVIDE - who claim to have literally seen - with their own eyes - human bones and/or teeth and/or corpses and/or parts of corpses - within and/or extracted from - this alleged “grave,” is no less than __?__.

 

V - Is it known - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - via laboratory DNA / “micro-chemical” analysis that - ANYTHING - claimed to have been extracted from within this alleged “grave” is of human origin - Yes. - or - No. ??

 

W - The number of people - WHOSE NAMES YOU CAN PROVIDE - who claim to have literally participated in the laboratory DNA / “micro-chemical” analysis that proved - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that - ANYTHING - claimed to have been extracted from within this alleged “grave” is of human origin, is no less than __?__.

 

X - Can you provide an actual / tangible photocopy of a legitimate scientific paper which details any alleged laboratory DNA / “micro-chemical” analysis that forensically proved - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that - ANYTHING - claimed to have been extracted from within this alleged “grave” is of human origin - Yes. - or - No. ??

 

(Note: If your answer to question X is - Yes. - your answer will not be accepted unless and until you mail said actual / tangible photocopy of said legitimate scientific paper to The N.A.F.H. for verification.)

 

Y - The number of people - WHOSE NAMES YOU CAN PROVIDE - who claim to have literally seen - with their own eyes - a legitimate scientific paper which details any alleged laboratory DNA / “micro-chemical” analysis that forensically proved - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that - ANYTHING - claimed to have been extracted from within this alleged “grave” is of human origin, is no less than __?__.

 

Z - The total number of people - WHOSE NAMES YOU CAN PROVIDE - who are - CURRENTLY - members of The Skeptics Society; members of the James Randi Educational Foundation; employees of a holocaust museum; masters level (or higher) teachers of history, holocaust education and/or genocide studies; professional forensic anthropologists; employees of Archaeology Magazine; masters level (or higher) teachers of forensic anthropology and/or archaeology; members of The Archaeological Institute of America; members of The American Academy of Forensic Sciences; and anyone who is named in lists A and B below; who have individually, explicitly and categorically endorsed your “mass grave / buried remains proof” (proving - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - that it contains the remains of at least 19 bodies) for this alleged “grave,” is no less than __?__.

 

 

Note: The first person on EACH of the following lists who completes - The N.A.F.H. “Mass Graves / Buried Remains” Forensic Evaluation Form - in complete accordance with the directions, will receive a - $500.00 - reward.


List A: Mikkel Andersson, Philip Blood, Christopher Browning, Mike Curtis, Martin Davidson, Martin Dean, Yale Edeiken, Andrzej Gawryszewski, Michael Gelb, Richard Green, Patrick Groff, Jonathan Harrison, Albrecht Kolthoff, Jurgen Langowski, Peter Laponder, Ralf Loserth, Andrew Mathis, Harry Mazal, Jamie McCarthy, Gord McFee, Christian Mentel, Roberto Muehlenkamp, Jason Myer, Michael Peters, Antony Polonsky, David Rich, Sergey Romanov, Andrea Simon, Nick Terry, Steve Tyas, Leonid Tyorushkin,  David Woolfe, John Zimmerman.


List B: Alex Bay, Sara Bloomfield, Caroline Sturdy Colls, Thomas Dalton, Richard Freund, Abraham Foxman, Juliet Golden, Alex Grobman, Yoram Haimi, Alan Hart, David Irving, Ephraim Kaye, Andrzej Kola, Thomas Kues, Deborah Lipstadt, Carmelo Lisciotto, Daniel Loxton, Lucja Nowak, Robin O’Neil, Avi Patt, James Randi, Philip Reeder, William Rutherford, Sarah Rutmanm, Michael Shermer, Claudia Theune, Michael Tregenza, Chris Webb, Mark Weber.

 

Also note that there is a total of - $6,200.00 - in additional reward money that is being offered to all the above named individuals for simply accepting - The C.S.I. Challenge. The first half of the reward will be paid out after they answer The $70,000.00 question and the second half will be paid out after their first eligible “proof” is submitted. FYI - To date, not one of the above named individuals has dared to answer The $70,000.00 question, much less accept any N.A.F.H. sponsored challenge. (What are they so afraid of?)

 

  

It is an irrefutable fact that not one person who espouses the orthodox stories of Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka has ever had the courage, integrity and character to accept the - Crime Scene Investigation Challenge TM - NOT ONE!

 

 

The thing that has to be done now, so that everyone is on the same page, is to identify each one of the 70

fraudulently alleged “graves” that are spuriously claimed to exist at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka:



Belzec - 33 alleged “graves.” Each of the fraudulently alleged “graves” (#1/1 though #33/33 of the alleged 70) are identified and numbered on the maps shown on pages 117 & 118, and the alleged dimensions of the fraudulently alleged 33 “graves” can be found on page 73, in this link here:

http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/belzec.pdf


Chelmno - 15 alleged “graves.” Each of the fraudulently alleged “graves” (#1/34 though #15/48 of the alleged 70) are allegedly identified on this map here:

http://www.deathcamps.org/occupation...lmnoforest.jpg

Alleged “grave” #1/34 is claimed to be - “irregular in shape; the width of the northern part 8 meters and narrows by 3 meters towards the south. Its length equals 62 meters.” Alleged depth? - “Unknown.”

Alleged “grave” #2/35 is claimed to be - “total length equals 254 meters.” Alleged width? - “Unknown.” Alleged depth? - “3 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #3/36 is claimed to be - “length 174 meters, width 8 meters.” Alleged depth? - “Unknown.”

Alleged “grave” #4/37 is claimed to be - “Its actual width equals 10 meters, while its length is 182 meters.” Alleged depth? - “Unknown.”

Alleged “grave” #5/38 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the most southerly of the 11 alleged “mass graves” in an alleged line of “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #6/39 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 2nd alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #7/40 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 3rd alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #8/41 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 4th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #9/42 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 5th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #10/43 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 6th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #11/44 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 7th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #12/45 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 8th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #13/46 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 9th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #14/47 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the 10th alleged “mass grave” (moving south to north) in the line of the 11 alleged “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

Alleged “grave” #15/48 is claimed to be - “from 9 x 7.5 meters to 15.50 x 8.50 meters.” Alleged depth? - “About 4 meters.” It is the most northerly of the 11 alleged “mass graves” in an alleged line of “mass graves” that make up what is fraudulently called “grave # 5.”

 

 

Sobibor - 11 alleged “graves.” Each of the fraudulently alleged “graves” (#1/49 though #10/58 of the alleged 70) are allegedly shown on this map here:

http://www.deathcamps.org/Sobibor/pic/sobibor.jpg

Alleged “grave” #1/49 is claimed to be - “20 x 20 meters with a depth of up to 4.30 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #2/50 is claimed to be - “irregular in shape, measuring at least 20 x 25 meters with a depth of up to 4 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #3/51 is claimed to be - “irregular in shape, measuring around 20 x 12 meters with a depth of up to 5.80 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #4/52 is claimed to be - “70 x 20 - 25 meters with a depth of around 5 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #5/53 is claimed to be - “irregular in shape, measuring at least 10 - 12 meters with a depth of up to 4.90 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #6/54 is claimed to be - “irregular in shape, measuring at least 15 x 25 meters with a depth of up to 3.05 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #7/55 is claimed to be - “at least 10 x 3 meters with a depth of up to 0.90 meters.”

Alleged “grave” #8/56 is the fraudulently alleged “ash mound” / monument.

Alleged “grave” #9/57 is the fraudulently alleged western-most so-called “forest grave.”

Alleged “grave” #10/58 is the fraudulently alleged eastern-most so-called “forest grave.”

 

Alleged “grave” #11/59 is the fraudulently alleged “mystery grave” claimed to have been discovered by Yoram Haimi “sometime in early 2011” - Alleged size and location is - a mystery!

 

 

Treblinka - 11 alleged “graves.” Each of the fraudulently alleged “graves” (#1/60 though #11/70 of the alleged 70) are allegedly shown on this map here:

 

http://forum.codoh.info/download/file.php?id=622&t=1

 

Alleged “grave” #1/60 is claimed to be - the northernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #2/61 is claimed to be - the 2nd northernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #3/62 is claimed to be - the 3rd northernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #4/63 is claimed to be - the 4th northernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #5/64 is claimed to be - the southernmost of the 5 pits in a row on the eastern edge of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #6/65 is claimed to be - the single, small rectangular trench in the north central area of the camp.


Alleged “grave” #7/66 is claimed to be - the northernmost of the two small pits in the south central area of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #8/67 is claimed to be - the southernmost of the two small pits in the south central area of the camp.

Alleged “grave” #9/68 is claimed to be - the single, large pit in the area that is claimed to be the former reception area of the camp.

 

Alleged “grave” #10/69 is claimed to be - the northernmost of the two large pits in the south eastern area of the camp.

 

Alleged “grave” #11/70 is claimed to be - the southernmost of the two large pits in the south eastern area of the camp.

 

 

* * * * *

The $70,000.00 question:

 

How many of the 70 alleged “graves” claimed to exist at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and

Treblinka can you prove - WITH 100 % CERTAINTY - contain the remains of at least 19 bodies?


* * * * *

 

Why are people being persecuted for expressing skepticism of so-called “truths” that forensic experts refuse to endorse?

 

How unjust is it to punish someone for “denying” something that is scientifically provable - but has never been so?

 

What has history taught us about so-called “truths” that required a shield of lies, laws and force?

 

* * * * *

 

All information on this website constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted material as provided for

in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Last updated on 1 / 27 / 13. All rights reserved.

 

For more information, contact - The N.A.F.H. at: treblinkafraud@yahoo.com

 

* * * * *

 

  

In the closed little minds of self-deceiving cowards,

absurd physical impossibilities are cravenly accepted as fact

and uncomfortable truths are magically transformed into “hate.”

* * * * *

 

MALFEASANCE

 

NONE  ARE  SO  BLIND

AS  THOSE  WHO  REFUSE  TO  SEE

THAT  FORENSICALLY  REFUTED  HOLOCAUST  LIES

ARE  STILL  BEING  TAUGHT  AS  “HISTORY”

NONE  ARE  SO  DEAF

AS  THOSE  WHO  REFUSE  TO  HEAR

THAT  SCIENTIFICALLY  DEBUNKED  WW  II  PROPAGANDA

IS  STILL  BEING  TAUGHT  AFTER  ALL  OF  THESE  YEARS

NONE  ARE  SO  SELF-DECEIVING

AS  THOSE  WHO  REFUSE  TO  ADMIT

THAT  ORTHODOX  HOLOCAUST  “HISTORY”

IS  FULL  OF  FORENSICALLY  REFUTED  BULLSHIT

NONE  ARE  SO  CRAVEN

AS  THOSE  WHO  WON’T  SPEAK  THE  TRUTH

AND  NOTHING  IS  WORSE  THAN  THE  INDOCTRINATORS

WHO  “TEACH”  ANTI-GERMAN  PROPAGANDA  TO  OUR  YOUTH

* * * * *

 

A hallmark of self-deceiving cowards is their acceptance of

 authority as their truth - rather than the truth as their authority.

* * * * *

 

Why do people continue to espouse forensically refuted lies even after being

 confronted with the incontrovertible facts that refute them? Because you can’t

 convince a true-believer of anything - for their beliefs are not based on science

 and reason - they’re based on blind faith and a weak-willed NEED to believe.

Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool critical thinkers - but rather;

Only to give self-deceiving cowards an excuse not to think at all.

* * * * *